Macworld 2008 and Apple's Strategy
Posted Thursday January 17, 2008 in Business
There’s nothing like a Steve Jobs keynote address for a Mac fan like me. For a lot of years in the ’90s, the Macworld keynote was just a list of products; but, since Apple’s turn-of-the-century rebirth, it’s been a window on the company’s emerging strategy. In Macworld after Macworld, Apple has revealed products that represented long bets — the iPod, the iTunes Music Store, Apple TV, iWork — and, if you look at Macworld with the same strategic eye as Jobs, there’s indications of the future there.
Channel Fever
If Jobs has learned anything from Apple’s dominance of digital music, it’s the power of controlling the sales channel. The iPod drives iTunes Music Store purchases drives Jobs’s vision of how the industry should work. Jobs clearly wants to do the same thing for movies. Thus, the Apple TV and the newest generation of Apple TV, and thus iTunes movie rentals. This play has nothing to do with a Microsoftian concept of dominance of the living room; Apple won’t own the space in the entertainment center next to the TV, they’ll own the way into the TV.
The strategy behind this is compelling. Apple has played a key role in basically destroying the existing music industry with iTunes; for a well-capitalized, technically-skilled emerging player in an industry, like Apple in music, disruption is a good thing, almost regardless of where that disruption leads. If Apple can disrupt TV’s ad-based model and movies’ DVD-based model, then, as the owner of the emerging channel to the consumer, Apple will be in a position to build a new industry in which it can dominate.
This is why it’s ok for the Apple TV to be feature-light and developing, and for iTunes to offer movies that may expire too soon: the journey of a thousand miles always has to begin with that one step.
What Long Game?
That’s why the MacBook Air appears so odd. The mini notebook is a new segment for Apple, but it’s a very competitive one, and the MacBook Air looks ordinary. Why would Apple launch such an obvious dud?
One problem Apple has in notebook technology is that it doesn’t really have a defined cutting-edge product. The MacBook needs to be affordable; the MacBook Pro needs to be powerful and capable. Neither can push the envelope if that means compromising on their basic value proposition. All the MacBook Air needs to be is style-forwards.
Strategically, Apple has a number of technical needs. More environmentally-friendly components would be a great PR boost. A good way to get the MacBook’s price down is to simplify its design by putting the whole system on a single board. Dropping overall voltage will lead to less heat and longer battery life across the whole laptop range. Making Intel design a new package for its chip just for Apple sets the relationship on the footing Apple would prefer. Multitouch may eventually be a super-efficient, well-loved interface tool that effectively differentiates the Mac OS from Windows and Linux. But all of these changes are expensive and technically challenging at first — then cheaper as volume ramps up. How to avoid implementing such changes all at once across a high-volume line of products that are critical to your bottom line? Launch a new product that will ship in smaller volumes!
Also, make no mistake: eliminating the DVD drive is part of the channel play. Jobs killed the floppy with the first iMac, and he’s betting he can do the same with the DVD. And it’s a smart strategy, because, if Blu-Ray and HD-DVD go nowhere, how else do you get your HD content? Oh, iTunes. Right.
Whence the iPhone?
So the iPhone has been out for a bit now, with no update. Well, guess what, it doesn’t need one! But there’s a channel play here too: by making the maps’ autolocation dependent on WiFi, Apple creates more demand for WiFi, which means more WiFi deployment, which means more places in which users can buy movies and TV on their iPhone.
Oh, and they save money by not having to build in a GPS receiver too. That’s nifty.
Time Capsule
Time Capsule hearkens back to the days in which Apple was in the computer business and nothing but. Back in those times, Apple had to continually roll out new features for its computers just to demonstrate its value as a company. It’s become clear that the main selling point of Macs is that they Just Work. Time Machine and Time Capsule are great examples of that: you plug in, you get a backup, and your data is kept much more reliably than with those other operating systems. That’s a good definition of just works. But it’s funny and nostalgic to see this small, progressive improvement in computer user experience in the basket with the big strategic plays.
So What’s Next?
Reasonably enough, scuttlebutt has it that the next big event — Apples World Wide Developer Conference — will be iPhone-centric. It would make sense to announce that the phone is open to new software then, but that’s all part of another long-term strategy we didn’t see from Apple here at Macworld.
The channel strategy will continue to grow as Apple pushes the studios to allow more features. Longer rentals will come in the next year or so; Apple will also push for some simultaneous releases on iTunes, which will work great for many of the direct-to-DVD releases, such as the myriad American Pie sequels.
Apple will integrate full 3G networking via AT&T’s upgraded network in the next version of the MacBook Air, just because Apple needs to start somewhere. And DVD drives will go away on all new Macs by this time next year: Apple will offer some sort of software purchasing and installation system, perhaps via Software Update. That’ll show the Blu-Ray and HD-DVD people!
But AppleTV will never work with TV, because that’s a different distribution channel. This means Apple won’t buy Tivo; you heard it here first. Amazon, however…
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
Comments
I think Time Capsule is going to be the hit of this year’s MacWorld. Everyone in the news has been gabbing about the Air (meh), and I hadn’t heard about Time Capsule til I went to the Apple website for unrelated reasons (looking up the number for my local retail store, because I wanted to arrange to go visit them to get Leopard and discuss some other software). I have for years wanted a backup system that would truly run automatically without my thinking about it. (Scheduled backup systems are very unreliable if you want to be able to turn your machine off at night.) Time Machine finally addressed this, mostly, but left you with the need to remember to plug a wire into your machine when you took it home. Time Capsule makes it so any time your machine is turned on, and on your wireless network, it will back itself up, such that you can lose at most one hour’s work.
The next obvious step is to make Time Capsule sync to some off-site storage, so if your house burns down (with your computer and Capsule inside) you still have a backup somewhere. Or, just as good, for Google to enter with a GBackup product that allows you to perform the Time Machine type of backup, to Google’s remote servers, any time you’re on any network.
Posted by: Auros
|
January 18, 2008 11:15 AM
BTW, regarding DVDs and content delivery — I still think that anyone with a vested interest in a new form of content delivery has a strong interest in getting buy-in from a large pool of consumers, to get the devices that read the new content out there. The power-play is to allow trade-ins of the old content form. Either of the consortia that own BluRay and HD-DVD could instantly make its format viable in the market if it said: Send us your old DVD, in its original case, along with a few bucks for S&H, and we’ll send you back the HD version. Since those consortia include content owners, it’s a mystery to me why they have’t done this.
If Apple could persuade some content owners to go in with it on digital delivery, it could make a similar play — surrender your DVD, get permanent access to the online form (including the right to log into your account on a computer at your friend’s house, and download a copy that can be played for 24 hours, like the new iTunes rentals).
Posted by: Auros
|
January 18, 2008 11:20 AM
Re: AppleTV and new forms of content delivery…
I think the power play in making a new delivery channel viable would be allowing trade-in. The Blu-Ray consortium should say: If a title is available on Blu-Ray, and you own the DVD, you can trade in the DVD, and a few bucks, for the Blu-Ray version. That would drive sales of Blu-Ray players, and earn loyalty and goodwill.
Apple could, if it got cooperation from content providers (a huge “if”), do a similar trade-in: turn in your DVD at an Apple Store, get rights on your iTunes account to download the iTunes rental version repeatedly (including by logging in on a friend’s machine, to watch it at their house).
Posted by: Auros
|
January 18, 2008 11:37 AM
Hey, how come the system ate my original comment on DVDs (I even reloaded the page!) and then revealed it when I posted a replacement? :-P
re: TV, iTunes already sells The Daily Show, and I don’t see why they wouldn’t be successful selling shows like Battlestar Galactica. Some shows that have cult followings, like Firefly or B5: Crusade, might actually have done better on iTunes than they did on a network, where they had to answer to idiot suits.
Posted by: Auros
|
January 18, 2008 11:52 AM
Well, Apple did the ultimate trade-in with iTunes: they just let you rip your CDs into it. Sadly, there’s no way to do that for DVDs currently — legally, at least. That’s the problem with piracy, it’s backwards-compatible (you can keep all of your old content if you rip it into the new format).
The studios will never agree to this, because they’ve already decided they want to make more money by selling you the same old content, in a new format. Lucrative, but, as you say, risky for the new format.
Jobs appears to be betting that the most convenient channel will be the one that wins out. That’s why he wants more out-of-the-home wifi, why he’s making the whole home wireless with things like Time Capsule, and why he’s taking out the DVD drive on the MacBook Air.
(I personally love the idea of Time Capsule — and am bitter that I recently replaced my wifi router and bought a big backup disk for Time Machine, at a significant portion of the cost of Time Capsule. Offsite backup seems to me to be a big missed opportunity with .Mac. What’s the ultimate reliability? Wipe the drive, boot from your .Mac rescue CD, which NetBoots you off your .Mac account, and you’re good to go in a half an afternoon. But, strategically, that’s not Apple’s big play, now or later.)
Posted by: juniorbird
|
January 18, 2008 11:54 AM
Re: Time Capsule and .Mac, it doesn’t seem like it is a play they’re currently focused on, but as an incremental improvement, it could be hugely attractive, and generate a lot of new subscription revenue. (I considered .Mac, but decided not to when I discovered that the most online storage I could pay for was 4 GB. If they’d offered me, say, 250 GB, I would’ve happily paid $20-$30/mo for that. And that’s enough to pay off the cost of a 250 GB drive after a year or so, and then provide almost pure profit forever after.
Posted by: Auros
|
January 18, 2008 1:00 PM